Hi Anna,
Yes, I would certainly agree with you and the latter correspondent in the Times.
Trafalgar was planned in meticulous detail some while ahead, and whilst Nelson's continued presence was to be expected, I don't think it was vital and later events were to bear this out. Even after Nelson had been shot, the battle continued largely to Nelson's plan. I don't think most captains and crews knew that Nelson had been hit for some little while afterwards, but I am sure that even if they had been aware of it, that fact wouldn't have changed the tactics used – and might even have ensured their continuance.
A large part of this must be put down to Nelson himself, and his desire to both keep everyone informed and to let his commanders and crews know what was expected of them. Nelson had also given them some leeway, in that by placing their ship alongside that of an enemy no-one could do very wrong.
Collingwood, of course, has his due, but that was largely to come after the battle. The earlier Times correspondent can perhaps be forgiven his view, given he went to the same school, but I think he is overstating it. I think Collingwood would most likely agree!
Btw, the earlier article regarding the Victory was something that I hadn't heard of, and I think I shall be buying Brian Lavery's new book!
_________________ Kester.
|